|
This topic was created before release of the latest product version, and it may contain details irrelevant to this version. Replying is disabled for this topic.
|
kylen
on Jan 8, 2005, 3:47pm:
Hi Aleksey,
I was wondering what the slope of the HP is?
I don't think it's steep - I was wondering if a steeper one would be possible to choose to create different compression possibilities?
Thanks for considering this!
I was wondering what the slope of the HP is?
I don't think it's steep - I was wondering if a steeper one would be possible to choose to create different compression possibilities?
Thanks for considering this!
Aleksey Vaneev
on Jan 9, 2005, 4:15am:
-12 dB/oct. I do not think making it steeper will do anything better. Probably something like key filtering could be a better solution. But right now I do not have plans to add this functionality to Polysquasher.
kylen
on Jan 9, 2005, 9:45am:
OK thanks - I didn't think it was that steep...I was using Polysquasher last night and rolled the HP upto 200Hz on a vocal track. At that setting a lot of the compression stopped which surprised me since the signal content has a lot of 900Hz energy. I'll try it again today and see if I can understand it better.
I'm using automation to control Polysquasher so I could (and already did) make my own key type side-chain by creating a bandpassed automation envelope in Sonar4 (using Blue Cat Digital Peak Meter Pro - outputs an automation envelope).
I'm using automation to control Polysquasher so I could (and already did) make my own key type side-chain by creating a bandpassed automation envelope in Sonar4 (using Blue Cat Digital Peak Meter Pro - outputs an automation envelope).
|
This topic was created before release of the latest product version, and it may contain details irrelevant to this version. Replying is disabled for this topic.
|
Copyright © 2002-2012 Aleksey Vaneev - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - About Voxengo - Questions & Answers