Voxengo - Sound with a Soul
Professional VST PlugIns and
AU PlugIns

Support Forums Shopping Cart
Equalizer Plugins Compressor Plugins Saturators, Guitar Amps All AU, VST Plugins Reverbs, Spatial Imaging Mastering Plugins Harmonic Enhancers Free VST, AU PlugIns Track Plugins Delay, Echo, Modulation Utility, Denoising, Analysis Drum and Cymbal Samples
Special offer - CurveEQ introductory price
Forums     Plugins     Impulse Modeler and Deconvolver
Fast downward sweep at end of 96 Khz test tone (?)

This topic was last updated 180 days ago, and thus it can be considered old.  Replying is disabled for this topic.

Hi Aleksey!

I have some new experiments for a Samplicity IR/ERs library.  This time I want to do it at 96/32.  It surprised me that at this sampling rate the test tone (sweep) has a quick down sweep towards the end (40 sec sweep).

Is this intentional?  Would it harm the deconvolution process?

I am sweeping a mixer setup (thus a full digital path @ 32 bit fp.  Would the downward sweep approach result in slightly better results?  With my previous IR libs the IRs contained quite some subsonic noise - from scientific literature I learned that this a quite normal side-effect.  Would a down sweep produce less subsonic stuff, or is this symmetric?

Thanks for any tips!  And answer on the first question ;-)

Peter Roos
Peter Emanuel Roos
www.PeterRoos.com / www.Samplicity.com (IR libs)

If you are hearing the downward tone when playing back the original test tone - it is an indication of aliasing happening on playback stage.  If you got the downward tone after the recording, it means the chain produces aliasing on some stage - it may be generated either by ADC/DAC or the device you are sampling.
This topic was last updated 180 days ago, and thus it can be considered old.  Replying is disabled for this topic.

Copyright © 2002-2012 Aleksey Vaneev - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - About Voxengo - Questions & Answers