Voxengo - Sound with a Soul
Professional VST PlugIns and
AU PlugIns

Support Forums Shopping Cart
Equalizer Plugins Compressor Plugins Saturators, Guitar Amps All AU, VST Plugins Reverbs, Spatial Imaging Mastering Plugins Harmonic Enhancers Free VST, AU PlugIns Track Plugins Delay, Echo, Modulation Utility, Denoising, Analysis Drum and Cymbal Samples
Special offer - CurveEQ introductory price
Forums     Plugins     Elephant
Dithering to 16 bit: TPDF or Gauss?

This topic was last updated 180 days ago, and thus it can be considered old.  Replying is disabled for this topic.

Last

Next

Previous

First




Can't really hear the difference but the option is given for my Voxengo 'Elephant' plug.

Any recommendation for orchestral mock ups?


Thanks in advance.

Rob

Any opinions?

Indeed, it's hardly possible to hear difference.  I would use Gauss.

Thanks Aleksey - what about 'shaping' - classic or equal?


Many thanks in advance.

A college of mine has even mentioned to 'turn off' shaping.  Your thoughts Aleksey?


Rob

That depends on your taste and actual resolution of your recording.  For example, I have drum recording which has real resolution of 17 bits over the whole spectrum.  In this case it's quite beneficial to use "Equal" shaping when coverting to 16 bits.  Otherwise noise-shaping is not necessary.

Good point Aleksey - I do Orchestral mock-ups and the 'sample libraries' are all 24 bit.  I deliver final mixes in 16 bit.


Should I then NOT use shaping?


Rob

No, I think you should use noise-shaping for better sound clarity.  But then again - listen, if it sounds OK, use it.

classic or equal?

I personally like both. :-)
This topic was last updated 180 days ago, and thus it can be considered old.  Replying is disabled for this topic.

Last

Next

Previous

First




Copyright © 2002-2012 Aleksey Vaneev - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - About Voxengo - Questions & Answers