|
This topic was last updated 180 days ago, and thus it can be considered old. Replying is disabled for this topic.
|
valuepack1
on Feb 10, 2009, 6:37pm, edited 2 time(s), last modified on Feb 10, 2009, 3:40pm:
is it possible to use crunchessor for sidechaining, just like live's built in compressor?
with one key signal, you can compress multiple signals each with its own settings without adding unnecessary channels.
maybe something like the db audioware compressor (with sending audio between the plugin instances)
or something like a "sender" effect that can be inserted in the fx chain of the key in ableton, and then send the audio to the crunchessors
thanks
with one key signal, you can compress multiple signals each with its own settings without adding unnecessary channels.
maybe something like the db audioware compressor (with sending audio between the plugin instances)
or something like a "sender" effect that can be inserted in the fx chain of the key in ableton, and then send the audio to the crunchessors
thanks
Aleksey Vaneev
on Feb 10, 2009, 8:25pm:
As far as I know, you can use Crunchessor's side-chain in Ableton Live.
valuepack1
on Feb 10, 2009, 8:46pm:
yep i can use it, but you need to add "unnecessary" channels (or am i missing something?), while with the built in one, you dont have to, you just insert it on the channel, and select the s/c input.
with the audioware plugin, you have to insert one to the key source as well, but you dont need extra channels in neither of these cases
with the audioware plugin, you have to insert one to the key source as well, but you dont need extra channels in neither of these cases
Aleksey Vaneev
on Feb 11, 2009, 6:31am:
valuepack1: yep i can use it, but you need to add ''unnecessary'' channels (or am i missing something?), while with the built in one, you dont have to, you just insert it on the channel, and select the s/c input.
With VSTs it's impossible otherwise while Audioware plugin most probably uses a non-standard approach.
valuepack1
on Feb 16, 2009, 11:24am:
Isn't it possible the same way as the gliss eqs can send their graphs to each other? But in this case we send the signal which is used to compress the other track, not the graphs
Aleksey Vaneev
on Feb 16, 2009, 6:08pm:
valuepack1: Isn't it possible the same way as the gliss eqs can send their graphs to each other? But in this case we send the signal which is used to compress the other track, not the graphs
It's probably possible, but this is not a reliable technique. That's why I won't pursue it. Spectrum exchange has less strict timing requirements.
valuepack1
on Feb 16, 2009, 7:18pm:
i understand.
thank you for the replies!
thank you for the replies!
Aleksey Vaneev
on Feb 17, 2009, 6:45am:
You are welcome!
|
This topic was last updated 180 days ago, and thus it can be considered old. Replying is disabled for this topic.
|
Copyright © 2002-2012 Aleksey Vaneev - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - About Voxengo - Questions & Answers