|
This topic was last updated 180 days ago, and thus it can be considered old. Replying is disabled for this topic.
|
John Lance
on Jun 16, 2010, 3:06am, edited 14 time(s), last modified on Jun 16, 2010, 6:38pm:
Something akin to the UAD Cambridge in basic functionality.
Here is what I need that is different, and have asked over at the Nuendo forum to be present in the current Nuendo EQ but I do not see it forthcoming:
I need eq levels to resolve to hundredths of a dB, and Q to also resolve in hundredths.
Cambridge will resolve to hundredths on the Q.
Sometimes it is just wonderful to grab a fully parametric EQ set and tweak until you're there, unless what you need is in between some offered setting. Here is the case in point. Say you need a broad EQ (low Q) boost of some 3 or so dB at some frequency. The jumps from .2 to .3 are simply too large for the Q and I find myself grabbing other parametrics to try to correct for the insufficiency here, and the result is never really quite satisfactory. The same thing applies when using a broad EQ (low Q) and you up the response by 0.1 dB. Over a broad range, that can add up to quite a tonal shift that is simply excessive when the dB setting and Q really needed to be something in between the offered settings.
I've got CurveEQ, but I tend to use that one for surgery, and getting such subtlety out of it like what a regular parametric should be able to produce quickly is difficult.
I know if you do an eq like I am asking for here, it will definitely sound properly. I am looking for a superb precision tool that is simple and clean, with no added mojo. It wouldn't hurt to have switchable linear phase or regular EQ for each section.
Pleeeeeeeeeeeease!
Here is what I need that is different, and have asked over at the Nuendo forum to be present in the current Nuendo EQ but I do not see it forthcoming:
I need eq levels to resolve to hundredths of a dB, and Q to also resolve in hundredths.
Cambridge will resolve to hundredths on the Q.
Sometimes it is just wonderful to grab a fully parametric EQ set and tweak until you're there, unless what you need is in between some offered setting. Here is the case in point. Say you need a broad EQ (low Q) boost of some 3 or so dB at some frequency. The jumps from .2 to .3 are simply too large for the Q and I find myself grabbing other parametrics to try to correct for the insufficiency here, and the result is never really quite satisfactory. The same thing applies when using a broad EQ (low Q) and you up the response by 0.1 dB. Over a broad range, that can add up to quite a tonal shift that is simply excessive when the dB setting and Q really needed to be something in between the offered settings.
I've got CurveEQ, but I tend to use that one for surgery, and getting such subtlety out of it like what a regular parametric should be able to produce quickly is difficult.
I know if you do an eq like I am asking for here, it will definitely sound properly. I am looking for a superb precision tool that is simple and clean, with no added mojo. It wouldn't hurt to have switchable linear phase or regular EQ for each section.
Pleeeeeeeeeeeease!
Aleksey Vaneev
on Jun 17, 2010, 4:42pm, edited 1 time(s), last modified on Jun 17, 2010, 4:42pm:
For precise Q control GlissEQ's "bandwidth" may be more adequate - and it has precision of two decimal positions after point.
GlissEQ filter's gain has precision of 1 decimal position after point, though. But when you use the Shift key for fine-tuning, the real resolution is higher - if you tune by ear, that should not be a problem.
GlissEQ filter's gain has precision of 1 decimal position after point, though. But when you use the Shift key for fine-tuning, the real resolution is higher - if you tune by ear, that should not be a problem.
|
This topic was last updated 180 days ago, and thus it can be considered old. Replying is disabled for this topic.
|
Copyright © 2002-2012 Aleksey Vaneev - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - About Voxengo - Questions & Answers